Bring a representation
Compare an existing embedding with other models. Report gene coverage, the origin of any text it embeds, and whether text entered its training.
Open-track instructionsHow much can a gene embedding predict when its input already contains clues to the answer? GeneProv compares text, sequence and expression models across four tasks, tracking the source of each input.
Human genes with an NCBI summary generated from Gene Ontology annotations, by linked publication count.
Top five of the original 20 representations, ranked by the GeneProv Index with a linear probe.
| Rank | Representation | Input or training modality | Index | 95% interval |
|---|
The original GO scorer mishandled tied predictions. GO scores and indices shown here await rescoring. Correction record
Full leaderboardChoose a track based on whether you can change the model’s input text.
Compare an existing embedding with other models. Report gene coverage, the origin of any text it embeds, and whether text entered its training.
Open-track instructionsEncode the same GenePT corpus twice. Removing Alliance-generated summaries in one version measures how much each encoder’s GO score depends on those summaries.
Fixed-text instructionsThe index averages GO recovery, non-GO endpoints and co-essentiality retrieval. A fourth task evaluates later experimental annotations for models that meet the historical input rules. Task definitions
Jiawei Wu, Huishu Wang, Junlin Chen and Hongyi Wang
@misc{wu2026genesummaries,
title = {When gene summaries reveal the answers: Gene Ontology circularity in gene embedding benchmarks},
author = {Wu, Jiawei and Wang, Huishu and Chen, Junlin and Wang, Hongyi},
year = {2026},
note = {Preprint},
url = {https://hwang595.github.io/gene-embedding-exposure/}
}